https://wiki.mako.cc/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=AaronSw&feedformat=atom WikiDotMako - User contributions [en] 2024-03-29T02:26:54Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.38.4 https://wiki.mako.cc/index.php?title=Network_services/Meeting&diff=249 Network services/Meeting 2008-03-16T18:08:03Z <p>AaronSw: /* Attendees */</p> <hr /> <div>The mini-summit will be held on March 16, 2008 at the FSF office. Additional details will be forthcoming.<br /> <br /> == Attendees ==<br /> <br /> The following members will be ''in attendance:''<br /> <br /> * [http://gburt.blogspot.com/ Gabriel Burt], Novell<br /> * [[User:Benjamin Mako Hill|Benjamin Mako Hill]], Director, FSF<br /> * [http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/ Mike Linksvayer], VP, Creative Commons<br /> * Henri Poole, Director, FSF<br /> * Brett Smith, Licensing Expert, FSF<br /> * James Vasile, Lawyer, [http://softwarefreedom.org Software Freedom Law Center]<br /> * [http://tieguy.org/ Luis Villa], Proto-lawyer, Columbia Law School<br /> <br /> The follow members have been invited to ''call in'' and expressed<br /> interest in doing so:<br /> * [http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn Bradley M. Kuhn], President, Software Freedom Conservancy ''(Calling in from the road)''<br /> * [http://www.rufuspollock.org/ Rufus Pollock] and/or Jonathan Gray from [http://www.okfn.org OKFN] ''(Calling from Britain)''<br /> * [http://evan.prodromou.name/ Evan Prodromou] ''(Calling from Buenos Aires)''<br /> * [http://www.canonical.org/~kragen/ Kragen Sitaker] ''(Calling from Argentina)''<br /> * [http://www.aaronsw.com/ Aaron Swartz] ''(Calling from San Francisco)''<br /> <br /> == Schedule ==<br /> <br /> * '''11:30''' - Meet for lunch and discussion at [http://www.cambrew.com/ Cambridge Brewing Company] ([http://maps.google.com/maps?ie=UTF8&amp;q=brewing+company&amp;near=Cambridge,+MA&amp;fb=1&amp;cid=0,0,4481462352498853113&amp;ll=42.367359,-71.091285&amp;spn=0.009053,0.015986&amp;z=16 totally not free Google map] [http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.36229&amp;lon=-71.08621&amp;zoom=16&amp;layers=B0FT free software, free data OpenStreetMap]) -- if people like we can meet at the Kendall Square T station at 11:15 and then walk there together<br /> * '''~13:00''' - Move to FSF board room for in-person discussion<br /> * '''19:00''' - Dinner at currently other undecided local restaurant<br /> <br /> == Agenda ==<br /> <br /> # Introductions - Who are we and why are we here?<br /> # Sharing Utopian Visions - &quot;We'll know we've succeeded when...&quot;<br /> # Review of reference service list - What are our thoughts and intuitions?<br /> # Problems: What's between us and our visions becoming real? What was wrong with the reference services we previously outlined?<br /> # Review of suggested approaches: General thoughts on shortcomings and benefits?<br /> # Personal or group recommendations: What should we do? What can or should the FSF do?<br /> # What should ''this'' group do moving forward?<br /> <br /> == Calling Instructions ==<br /> <br /> If you're calling in to the summit, you can do so with any of the following:<br /> <br /> * +1 (617) 861 9106 (works everywhere)<br /> * +1 (800) 819 5312 (only works inside the U.S.)<br /> * sip:1001@beeblebrox.gnu.org<br /> <br /> If you use one of the POTS numbers, the disembodied voice of our sysadmin will welcome you to the GPLv3 conference server (don't panic, it's still the right server) and ask you to enter the conference room number. That's 1001.<br /> <br /> After you do that, or after you call the SIP number, the Asterisk lady will ask you for the conference PIN number. That's 8741. After you enter that, you should be patched into the summit.<br /> <br /> If you call in and the Boston people aren't there, it probably means lunch/the FSF board meeting ran over. Try not to panic, and we'll get there as soon as we can.<br /> <br /> '''Backchannel:''' IRC backchannel is available at irc://irc.freenode.net/netservices (#netservices on irc.freenode.net).</div> AaronSw https://wiki.mako.cc/index.php?title=Network_services/Meeting&diff=248 Network services/Meeting 2008-03-16T16:11:47Z <p>AaronSw: /* Calling Instructions */</p> <hr /> <div>The mini-summit will be held on March 16, 2008 at the FSF office. Additional details will be forthcoming.<br /> <br /> == Attendees ==<br /> <br /> The following members will be ''in attendance:''<br /> <br /> * [http://gburt.blogspot.com/ Gabriel Burt], Novell<br /> * [[User:Benjamin Mako Hill|Benjamin Mako Hill]], Director, FSF<br /> * [http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/ Mike Linksvayer], VP, Creative Commons<br /> * Henri Poole, Director, FSF<br /> * Brett Smith, Licensing Expert, FSF<br /> * James Vasile, Lawyer, [http://softwarefreedom.org Software Freedom Law Center]<br /> * [http://tieguy.org/ Luis Villa], Proto-lawyer, Columbia Law School<br /> <br /> The follow members have been invited to ''call in'' and expressed<br /> interest in doing so:<br /> * [http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn Bradley M. Kuhn], President, Software Freedom Conservancy ''(Calling in from the road)''<br /> * [http://www.rufuspollock.org/ Rufus Pollock] and/or Jonathan Gray from [http://www.okfn.org OKFN] ''(Calling from Britain)''<br /> * [http://evan.prodromou.name/ Evan Prodromou] ''(Calling from Buenos Aires)''<br /> * [http://www.canonical.org/~kragen/ Kragen Sitaker] ''(Calling from Argentina)''<br /> * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz Aaron Swartz] ''(Calling from San Francisco)''<br /> <br /> == Schedule ==<br /> <br /> * '''11:30''' - Meet for lunch and discussion at [http://www.cambrew.com/ Cambridge Brewing Company] ([http://maps.google.com/maps?ie=UTF8&amp;q=brewing+company&amp;near=Cambridge,+MA&amp;fb=1&amp;cid=0,0,4481462352498853113&amp;ll=42.367359,-71.091285&amp;spn=0.009053,0.015986&amp;z=16 totally not free Google map] [http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.36229&amp;lon=-71.08621&amp;zoom=16&amp;layers=B0FT free software, free data OpenStreetMap]) -- if people like we can meet at the Kendall Square T station at 11:15 and then walk there together<br /> * '''~13:00''' - Move to FSF board room for in-person discussion<br /> * '''19:00''' - Dinner at currently other undecided local restaurant<br /> <br /> == Agenda ==<br /> <br /> # Introductions - Who are we and why are we here?<br /> # Sharing Utopian Visions - &quot;We'll know we've succeeded when...&quot;<br /> # Review of reference service list - What are our thoughts and intuitions?<br /> # Problems: What's between us and our visions becoming real? What was wrong with the reference services we previously outlined?<br /> # Review of suggested approaches: General thoughts on shortcomings and benefits?<br /> # Personal or group recommendations: What should we do? What can or should the FSF do?<br /> # What should ''this'' group do moving forward?<br /> <br /> == Calling Instructions ==<br /> <br /> If you're calling in to the summit, you can do so with any of the following:<br /> <br /> * +1 (617) 861 9106 (works everywhere)<br /> * +1 (800) 819 5312 (only works inside the U.S.)<br /> * sip:1001@beeblebrox.gnu.org<br /> <br /> If you use one of the POTS numbers, the disembodied voice of our sysadmin will welcome you to the GPLv3 conference server (don't panic, it's still the right server) and ask you to enter the conference room number. That's 1001.<br /> <br /> After you do that, or after you call the SIP number, the Asterisk lady will ask you for the conference PIN number. That's 8741. After you enter that, you should be patched into the summit.<br /> <br /> If you call in and the Boston people aren't there, it probably means lunch/the FSF board meeting ran over. Try not to panic, and we'll get there as soon as we can.<br /> <br /> '''Backchannel:''' IRC backchannel is available at irc://irc.freenode.net/netservices (#netservices on irc.freenode.net).</div> AaronSw https://wiki.mako.cc/index.php?title=Network_services/Definitions&diff=219 Network services/Definitions 2008-03-11T03:16:51Z <p>AaronSw: </p> <hr /> <div>Definitions can be used, as in the Free Software and Free Culture definitions, to highlight network services that meet a standard of freedom.<br /> <br /> == Summary of current practices ==<br /> <br /> [http://www.opendefinition.org/osd OSD]: Open data (private data only open to the user it's about) and public free software.<br /> <br /> [http://live.gnome.org/FreeOpenServicesDefinition FOSD]: unclear. also issues of hardware access / site stability?<br /> <br /> == Open issues ==<br /> <br /> * What do you do about Googlejuice?<br /> * What do you do about identity?<br /> * Are external dependencies permitted?<br /> * Ease-of-install requirements?<br /> * Interoperability requirements?<br /> * Requirement to share aggregate/anonymized user data?</div> AaronSw https://wiki.mako.cc/index.php?title=Network_services/Recommendations&diff=218 Network services/Recommendations 2008-03-11T03:16:24Z <p>AaronSw: </p> <hr /> <div>Ultimately, we should make suggestions and recommendations.<br /> <br /> Things we might want to keep in mind include:<br /> <br /> * What do and should network services mean? How broad or narrow should we be in our recommendations? How do we need to divide things up to understand and handle them? What is our scope and our limitations? <br /> * The FSF's real power has been in taking principled statements in favor or essential freedoms. Is that something we can or should do in this case? If so, what might it be?<br /> ** Is the idea that the FSF's power comes from making statements noncontroversial? It seems to me the FSF's real power comes from being an effective maintainer of the GPL (and to A Lesser extent its cousins, ha ha) and of most of the crucial pieces required to run Free Software on any computer (ie GNU).<br /> ** What ethical responsibilities and rights can and should we make statements about?<br /> * A general evaluation of the classes of solutions out there including:<br /> ** Legal approaches<br /> ** Technical approaches<br /> ** Social approaches<br /> * A list of concrete ideas how to proceed and explicit recommendations. <br /> ** Should we start a GNU project for building &quot;free&quot; versions of popular hosted services?<br /> <br /> Finally, we should consider our own next steps:<br /> <br /> * What, if any, are the next steps for this group?<br /> * Do want to open up this group? If so, when and how?</div> AaronSw https://wiki.mako.cc/index.php?title=Network_services/Definitions&diff=217 Network services/Definitions 2008-03-11T03:14:07Z <p>AaronSw: </p> <hr /> <div>Definitions can be used, as in the Free Software and Free Culture definitions, to highlight network services that meet a standard of freedom.<br /> <br /> == Summary of current practices ==<br /> <br /> [http://www.opendefinition.org/osd OSD]: Open data (private data only open to the user it's about) and public free software.<br /> <br /> [http://live.gnome.org/FreeOpenServicesDefinition FOSD]: unclear. also issues of hardware access / site stability?<br /> <br /> == Open issues ==<br /> <br /> * What do you do about Googlejuice?<br /> * What do you do about identity?<br /> * External dependencies<br /> * Interoperability requirements?<br /> * Requirement to share aggregate/anonymized user data?</div> AaronSw https://wiki.mako.cc/index.php?title=Network_services/Current_approaches&diff=216 Network services/Current approaches 2008-03-11T03:08:08Z <p>AaronSw: </p> <hr /> <div>What are the approaches that people are using to try to address<br /> webservices. These might include:<br /> <br /> === Abstention ===<br /> <br /> For certain classes of applications that have functionally equivalent<br /> distributed or non-service version or analogs, one can avoid inherent<br /> power dynamics that inherently disadvantage users by avoiding the use of<br /> applications. See Richard Stallman's essay sent over email for more<br /> information on this position.<br /> :''functionally equivalent'' -- this doesn't really seem like abstention.<br /> <br /> === P2P ===<br /> <br /> Attempt to replace centralized functionality with [http://lists.canonical.org/pipermail/kragen-tol/2006-July/000818.html decentralized] (and Free) applications. <br /> <br /> === Make running own services more attractive ===<br /> <br /> It is a huge pain to deploy and maintain one's own services. Software like WordPress and MediaWiki are much, much better than what existed 5 years ago, but they are still painful, and impossible for someone without lots of time and/or expertise to maintain. Thus, everyone has moved to centralized services, almost all of which are non-Free in one or more ways.<br /> <br /> === Push for free services ===<br /> <br /> This has three parts:<br /> <br /> # Define what a free service is<br /> # Make the case to centralized service providers to free their service<br /> # Build a user movement to demand free services (possibly thru abstention)<br /> <br /> For #2, there is a pragmatic case. Their competitive advantage comes from the platform (ability to run it effectively and efficiently at scale, and network effects). Allow users to improve platform.<br /> <br /> === Others ===<br /> <br /> Other ideas might include:<br /> <br /> * Cooperative hosting solutions.<br /> * Contracts and accountability for hosting providers<br /> ** Ensure that the services provide you with a way to leave (freedom to leave)<br /> * A Network Services &quot;Bill of Rights&quot; (e.g., [http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/3266][http://www.camworld.com/archives/001226.html])<br /> * Increased monitoring ability for hosting providers<br /> <br /> Other license based approaches are described in depth on [[Network services/Licensing approaches to network services]].</div> AaronSw https://wiki.mako.cc/index.php?title=Network_services/Current_approaches&diff=215 Network services/Current approaches 2008-03-11T03:06:02Z <p>AaronSw: </p> <hr /> <div>What are the approaches that people are using to try to address<br /> webservices. These might include:<br /> <br /> === Abstention ===<br /> <br /> For certain classes of applications that have functionally equivalent<br /> distributed or non-service version or analogs, one can avoid inherent<br /> power dynamics that inherently disadvantage users by avoiding the use of<br /> applications. See Richard Stallman's essay sent over email for more<br /> information on this position.<br /> :''functionally equivalent'' -- this doesn't really seem like abstention.<br /> <br /> === Extending copyleft to web services ===<br /> <br /> Quite a few projects have attempted <br /> :Such as? Does this refer to [[Network services/Licensing approaches to network services]] or something else?<br /> <br /> === P2P ===<br /> <br /> Attempt to replace centralized functionality with [http://lists.canonical.org/pipermail/kragen-tol/2006-July/000818.html decentralized] (and Free) applications. <br /> <br /> === Make running own services more attractive ===<br /> <br /> It is a huge pain to deploy and maintain one's own services. Software like WordPress and MediaWiki are much, much better than what existed 5 years ago, but they are still painful, and impossible for someone without lots of time and/or expertise to maintain. Thus, everyone has moved to centralized services, almost all of which are non-Free in one or more ways.<br /> <br /> === Push for free services ===<br /> <br /> This has three parts:<br /> <br /> # Define what a free service is<br /> # Make the case to centralized service providers to free their service<br /> # Build a user movement to demand free services (possibly thru abstention)<br /> <br /> For #2, there is a pragmatic case. Their competitive advantage comes from the platform (ability to run it effectively and efficiently at scale, and network effects). Allow users to improve platform.<br /> <br /> === Others ===<br /> <br /> Other ideas might include:<br /> <br /> * Cooperative hosting solutions.<br /> * Contracts and accountability for hosting providers<br /> ** Ensure that the services provide you with a way to leave (freedom to leave)<br /> * A Network Services &quot;Bill of Rights&quot; (e.g., [http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/3266][http://www.camworld.com/archives/001226.html])<br /> * Increased monitoring ability for hosting providers<br /> <br /> Other license based approaches are described in depth on [[Network services/Licensing approaches to network services]].</div> AaronSw https://wiki.mako.cc/index.php?title=Network_services/Problems&diff=214 Network services/Problems 2008-03-11T03:03:59Z <p>AaronSw: </p> <hr /> <div>We should have a clear statement and description of the problems for freedom that network services introduce along with examples, classifications, and necessary context.<br /> <br /> == Undisputed ==<br /> <br /> * Copyright holders don't know about AGPLv3<br /> * Developers have no clear set of best practices for making &quot;free&quot; services<br /> * Public frequently using services that don't preserve their freedom<br /> <br /> == Disputed ==<br /> <br /> === Coders ===<br /> * A number of coders have worked for long periods on code that they assumed would be 'free' only to discover that others were using their code (which they had distributed) as a service and not distributing derivatives.<br /> ** Is this a problem? Release code under AGPLv3, solved. If there is a problem it is that AGPLv3 is relatively unknown and not well understood, nor is there much code released under the license so as to encourage release of yet more code under the license. So the solution is AGPLv3 education, evangelism, and most importantly release of code by people who do understand under AGPLv3.<br /> * Some coders feel that an important freedom is the freedom to deliver applications on their own public accessible servers without sharing their derivatives.<br /> ** Is this a problem? Don't use AGPLv3 code, solved.<br /> * Some service interfaces and business models are patented, notably Amazon S3. See http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/06/0439245 .<br /> ** Is this problem at all unique to services? http://endsoftpatents.org/ amen. <br /> <br /> === Public ===<br /> * Generally, users of software as a service have a particularly difficult time gaining the freedom to copy, distribute, or study code. In short, their autonomy is compromised.<br /> * Users of some critical civic applications (like software running voting machines) have no way to study the code - undermining basic principles of democracy. [While this is a problem, is it really a service-related problem? It seems like the scope of our problem is big enough without expanding it to include embedded systems like voting systems. I'd assumed our focus was on web services. Ditto next statement. --LuisVilla]<br /> ** Agree with Luis<br /> * As software becomes used in nanotechnology (like health applications), the four freedoms will likely become more and more important in areas that are not generally seen today as domains for software<br /> ** Agree with Luis<br /> * An otherwise Free service could require a non-Free client, eg if the service renders media or UI such as patent-encumbered formats and Flash. One way to think of the solution is that everything required to deploy and use a Free service should be DFSG compliant. For a Free serivce that is a website, this means the code and data on the server and the code required to interact with the service on the client.<br /> <br /> <br /> === Deployers ===<br /> These are included kind of for completeness; it's nice (and practical, if we want any adoption to happen) to include the interests all parties in our discussion.<br /> * &quot;Free&quot; and &quot;open&quot; have different meanings for service deployers. &quot;Free&quot; has come to mean &quot;gratis&quot;, and &quot;open&quot; just means &quot;anyone can use it (even if it may requires payment)&quot;.<br /> ** Again, is this at all unique to services?<br /> * AGPL is effectively a Lesser/Library license, in that it provides no mechanism for free-software-oriented deployers to ensure that consumers of networked APIs are themselves open if they so desire.<br /> ** In that case the GPL is a lesser license in that [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#MereAggregation IPC does not necessarily trigger copyleft]. Attempting to legally mandate what runs on a client machine (private, not offering services to the public) seems antisocial, if not leading to treachery, and as a practical matter, very few users.<br /> * Typically free software requirements have stopped at the door of one's computer; it's nobody else's business what I do with my own software on my own server(s). Requirements on deployers will definitely give the appearance of being intrusive and asking too much.<br /> ** Education/evangelism problem.<br /> * Custom software, like for a Web service, often has lots of glue code, twiddles, dependencies and hacks. These aren't often documented internally, much less ready for distribution to the world as Free Software.<br /> ** This is also a leading excuse for not releasing non-networked code under a Free license. Embrace good software engineering practices. Make it easy for users to deploy services from revision control with a vendor branch and republish changes from their revision control system.</div> AaronSw https://wiki.mako.cc/index.php?title=Network_services/Definitions&diff=213 Network services/Definitions 2008-03-11T03:01:18Z <p>AaronSw: </p> <hr /> <div>Definitions can be used, as in the Free Software and Free Culture definitions, to highlight network services that meet a standard of freedom.<br /> <br /> == Summary of current practices ==<br /> <br /> [http://www.opendefinition.org/osd OSD]: Open data (private data only open to the user it's about) and public free software.<br /> <br /> [http://live.gnome.org/FreeOpenServicesDefinition FOSD]: unclear. also issues of hardware access / site stability?<br /> <br /> == Open issues ==<br /> <br /> * What do you do about Googlejuice?<br /> * What do you do about identity?<br /> * External dependencies</div> AaronSw https://wiki.mako.cc/index.php?title=Network_services/Definitions&diff=212 Network services/Definitions 2008-03-11T02:55:03Z <p>AaronSw: New page: Definitions can be used, as in the Free Software and Free Culture definitions, to highlight network services that meet a standard of freedom. == Summary of current practices == [http://w...</p> <hr /> <div>Definitions can be used, as in the Free Software and Free Culture definitions, to highlight network services that meet a standard of freedom.<br /> <br /> == Summary of current practices ==<br /> <br /> [http://www.opendefinition.org/osd OSD]: Open data (private data only open to the user it's about) and public free software.</div> AaronSw https://wiki.mako.cc/index.php?title=Network_services&diff=211 Network services 2008-03-11T02:53:09Z <p>AaronSw: /* Report Notes and Brainstorming */</p> <hr /> <div>This page is for collecting information for a nascent effort to investigate freedom for network services by the [http://www.fsf.org Free Software Foundation]. It is currently focused around a [[Network services/Meeting|mini-summit]] that the FSF is holding on March 16, 2008. That is summit is currently semi-private. This page is public but please do not link it publicly at this time.<br /> <br /> The summit itself was announced with the following text:<br /> <br /> :The last decade has witnessed a rise in the role of computing as a service, a massive increase in the use of web applications, the migration of personal computing tasks to data-centers, and the creation of new classes of service-based applications. These shifts have raised a host of important questions for the advocates of free software. For example, by separating use and distribution of software, these models have reduced the relevance of GPL-style copyleft which treat modified web applications as if they were private software. Much more importantly, the movement of software off of personal computers has reconfigured power relationships between users and their software and complicated questions of ownership and control in ways that free software advocates do not yet know how to address.<br /> <br /> :This last year, the FSF launched a new license, the AGPLv3, that re-addresses copyleft in the context of network-services. While it marks an important first step, the access to source code alone provided by the AGPLv3 might not necessarily make the users of web-services free. Work and thinking about these problems is far from over.<br /> <br /> :On March 16th, the FSF will gather together a small group of free software activists, thinkers, and scholars to identify the important questions that web services raise for free software and to start to probe the answers. What does freedom mean for the users and developers of web services? What is at risk? What should the free software community, and the Free Software Foundation, do to ensure that software, and its users, stay free in this new technological environment?<br /> <br /> == Mini-Summit ==<br /> <br /> Information including logistics, agenda, and attendees for the upcoming &quot;mini-summit&quot; on March 16, 2008 at the FSF offices is being put together on the [[Network services/Meeting]] page.<br /> <br /> == Reading list ==<br /> <br /> Please review the items in the list and add anything important to this list. It is currently presented in no particular order. Most of these pages contain links to other sources. Please take time to review these links where you think they are helpful.<br /> <br /> * The OKFN's [http://www.opendefinition.org/osd Open Service Definition]<br /> * Luis Villa's [http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/07/22/evaluating-a-freeopen-service-definition-rough-draft/ Evaluating a Free/Open Service Definition Rough Draft]<br /> * Luis Villa's [http://live.gnome.org/FreeOpenServicesDefinition Free Open Services Definition]<br /> * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affero_GPL Affero GPL Wikipedia Article] and the [http://www.affero.org/oagf.html old AGPL FAQ]<br /> <br /> Other work worth looking at:<br /> <br /> * [http://www.gavinbaker.com/presentations/fls-2008/ Talk by Gavin Baker] on free services. Impress and PDF slides are available but the slide content is pretty thin.<br /> * The [http://www.telematicsfreedom.org/ Telematics Freedom initiative] has [http://blog.telematicsfreedom.org/2007/04/25/free-telematics-a-model-for-the-democratic-control-of-telematic-services-2/ a model] which is based round contracts and extreme auditibility. It seems designed primarily with government and state-based decision-making in mind.<br /> <br /> ''Additional unpublished reading material has been sent over email. If you are attending the meeting and not received something, please contact [[User:Benjamin Mako Hill|Benjamin Mako Hill]].''<br /> <br /> == Report Notes and Brainstorming ==<br /> <br /> The major goal of the meeting is to produce a report that covers the following areas. Please don't hesitate to add or edit any of the following report. Let's collect, read, think through, and add as much information ''before'' the meeting.<br /> <br /> # [[Network services/Problems|Description of the problems]] caused by network services<br /> # [[Network services/Current approaches]] to addressing or mitigating problems<br /> ## [[Network services/Licensing approaches to network services|Licensing approaches]] to network services<br /> ## [[Network services/Model terms of service approaches to network services|Model TOS approaches]] to network services<br /> ## [[Network services/Model privacy policy approaches to network services|Model privacy policy approaches]] to network services<br /> ## [[Network services/Definitions|Definitions]] to highlight free services<br /> # [[Network services/Recommendations|Our recommendations]] to the FSF and to other concerned communities</div> AaronSw