|
|
| (19 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{notice|[[Benjamin Mako Hill]] maintains this page. Please ''do not'' change the message of the material on this page. Please ''do'' [[:wikipedia:WP:BOLD|be bold]] and fix errors or other issues. It's a [[:wikipedia:wiki|wiki]] after all!}} | | {{notice|This page has moved to [https://wiki.communitydata.cc/Prospective_graduate_students_(UW) a new home in the Community Data Science Collective wiki]. Please visit that page at: https://wiki.communitydata.cc/Prospective_graduate_students_(UW)}} |
| | |
| The [http://www.uw.edu University of Washington] [http://www.com.washington.edu Department of Communication] has an absolutely wonderful PhD program. When I was considering graduate school, I very nearly went here myself. The good news for me is that — because there is an unwritten rule that universities should not hire their own students — I now get to teach here.
| |
| | |
| == What I'm looking for in students ==
| |
| | |
| I am looking for students with a technical background (e.g., programming, statistics, and/or mathematics) and an interest and experience in free software, free culture, or other [[:wikipedia:peer production|peer production communities]] online. I would like to work with students interested in studying [[:wikipedia:peer production|peer production communities]] to understand how and why they work. If you contribute to a wiki, a remixing community, or a free software project, if you use GNU/Linux, if you enjoy programming (even if it's a means to solving problems you do care about), and if you want to become a social scientist, please consider applying to our department and let me know you've applied.
| |
| | |
| It's OK if you're not an expert in all this stuff yet or if you don't know a lot of statistics yet. After all, learning these tools is a big part of why you're going to graduate school. What's important is that you show me (and the admissions committee) that you're interested and able to learn.
| |
| | |
| Personally, I'm much less concerned with things like grades and test scores than I am with a proven ability to build things, to ask interesting questions, to write working code, to craft solid prose, and to make the world a better place -- of course, admission to our department is not up to me and things like grades and test scores certainly help your case.
| |
| | |
| == Applying to UW ==
| |
| | |
| If you have not already, you should check out the following information about applying to the UW Communication program:
| |
| | |
| * [http://www.com.washington.edu/student-admissions/graduate-admissions-maphd/ UW Department of Communication Admissions Homepage]
| |
| * [http://www.com.washington.edu/student-admissions/graduate-admissions-maphd/faq/ UW Department of Communication Admissions FAQ]
| |
| | |
| Please keep in mind that '''I do not serve on the graduate admissions committee'''. I will not be reading applications. I will not be making the first cut through applicants. I will not be making the final decisions. In fact, the only impact I normally will have in the graduate admissions process is giving feedback on students who the admissions committee has decided are likely to work with me. | |
| | |
| Our department is wide and interdisciplinary and accepts a wide variety of students with interests in doing work that spans the humanities and social sciences. Normally, I will only weigh in on students with strong programming, quantitative, and mathematical skills whose proposed research agenda involves quantitative data science on computer mediated communication and online communities.
| |
| | |
| == Emailing questions ==
| |
| | |
| If you have questions about the department or the admissions process you should check the material on the [http://www.com.washington.edu/student-admissions/graduate-admissions-maphd/ admission website], look carefully through [http://www.com.washington.edu/student-admissions/graduate-admissions-maphd/faq/ FAQ], and contact the admissions staff who will be more helpful and more responsive than I am.
| |
| | |
| If you have questions about my research or about working with me, you can email me directly at [mailto:makohill@uw.edu makohill@uw.edu]. If I don't know you, you should introduce yourself by describing your interests, qualifications and the reason you think these are a match for my research interests and methodologies. If you don't know my research interests and methods, you should look through [http://mako.cc/academic/ my academic page] — maybe even read a couple papers — and try to make sure it really is a good match.
| |
| | |
| Please keep in mind that I am often busy and not always awesome at email. As a result, it might take me some time to respond to prospective students. If it's been more than a couple weeks, feel free to ping me again.
| |
| | |
| == Meetings (prospective UW graduate students) ==
| |
| | |
| Many university faculty have blanket rules against meeting with prospective doctoral students. I personally met with both my masters and PhD advisors before I was admitted to their programs, so I will always consider meeting with prospective PhD students if time permits. If you really are very likely to work with me and if others reading your application will realize this, please get in touch with me.
| |
| | |
| Of course, there are hundreds of students interested in pursuing their PhD at UW Communication every year, so it is simply not possible for the faculty to meet with every interested student. That said, I'm happy to meet with prospective students whose interests and background match what I'm looking for.
| |
| | |
| This means that either of following things should be true:
| |
| | |
| :* You are interested in graduate school because you want to do quantitative data science on online communities and plan to use programming, statistics, and mathematics as the core of your research program.
| |
| :* You are interested in graduate school because you want to study [[:wikipedia:peer production|peer production]] and the production of online public goods like [[:wikipedia:free culture|free culture]] and [[:wikipedia:free software|free software]].
| |
| | |
| In either case, you should be able to demonstrate a background and experience that suggest you have the skills to pull off the above. If the above does not apply, ''this doesn't mean I don't want to work with you''. It just means I'm extremely unlikely to be able to impact your application to the department. If one of my colleagues at UW has referred you to talk to me, that's also good enough because it means that that they might ask for my opinion when the admissions committee makes final decisions later.
| |
| | |
| == Meetings (admitted UW graduate students) ==
| |
| | |
| If you have been admitted to the UW Communication Department, I'd love to talk with you!
| |
| | |
| If you don't fulfill the criteria I listed above, that means I very likely did not participate in the review of your application. However, it ''does not'' mean I will not work with you at some point in the future, teach classes that you might take, or help you try to develop and frame your research as a graduate student at UW.
| |
| | |
| And of course, If you've been admitted to other good programs, I would also love to try to convince you to come to UW. I love UW and I love Seattle and I would love to tell you why.
| |
