Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 20: |
Line 20: |
|
| |
|
| === Thoughts === | | === Thoughts === |
| | | <add here> |
| [[User:Willscott|Willscott]] (on 2023-01-27): We've talked about the balance between ability to buy-out a leaving owner, and handling potential divergence between 'market value' and 'purchase value'. The thing that seems best for the community in my view would be something along the lines of:
| |
| | |
| # the house is given the option to buy-back the ownership share at <code>inflation-adjusted-purchase-price</code>.
| |
| # for sales at market value, half of the difference <code>[market value - inflation-adjusted-purchase-price]/2</code> goes to the house.
| |
| # for market sales, house retains 'right of first suggestion' for purchasers. (with some time boxing probably)
| |
