Network services/Reference services: Difference between revisions

From WikiDotMako
(Create rough list of potential services.)
 
(fix formatting. I hate the proliferation of wiki formats.)
Line 1: Line 1:
This is a list of services that might be considered "open" under various proposed definitions of "open" services, useful to test various arguments about what such a definition should or shouldn't contain.
This is a list of services that might be considered "open" under various proposed definitions of "open" services, useful to test various arguments about what such a definition should or shouldn't contain.


* Wikipedia: data and software are freely available. How are APIs licensed?
* Wikipedia: data and software are freely available. How are APIs licensed?
* geonames.org
* geonames.org
* hostip.info
* hostip.info
* gmail: server source is proprietary, but all (email) data is available via standardized/open protocols, and users can make the service transparent (from an identity perspective) by using other email addresses.
* gmail: server source is proprietary, but all (email) data is available via standardized/open protocols, and users can make the service transparent (from an identity perspective) by using other email addresses.
* Amazon EC2: server images are ~ standard xen images. If you can move your data and computation transparently between S3 and completely Free xen-based servers, is it open/free/autonomous service?
* Amazon EC2: server images are ~ standard xen images. If you can move your data and computation transparently between S3 and completely Free xen-based servers, is it open/free/autonomous service?
* GNU Savannah:  
* GNU Savannah:  
* Second Life: client is Free; service is not.
* Second Life: client is Free; service is not.
* audioscrobbler/last.fm:
* audioscrobbler/last.fm:
* altlaw.org:
* altlaw.org:
* chicagocrime.org (defunct): what happens when you mash up Free data with non-free services like google maps?
* chicagocrime.org (defunct): what happens when you mash up Free data with non-free services like google maps?

Revision as of 16:08, 12 March 2008

This is a list of services that might be considered "open" under various proposed definitions of "open" services, useful to test various arguments about what such a definition should or shouldn't contain.

  • Wikipedia: data and software are freely available. How are APIs licensed?
  • geonames.org
  • hostip.info
  • gmail: server source is proprietary, but all (email) data is available via standardized/open protocols, and users can make the service transparent (from an identity perspective) by using other email addresses.
  • Amazon EC2: server images are ~ standard xen images. If you can move your data and computation transparently between S3 and completely Free xen-based servers, is it open/free/autonomous service?
  • GNU Savannah:
  • Second Life: client is Free; service is not.
  • audioscrobbler/last.fm:
  • altlaw.org:
  • chicagocrime.org (defunct): what happens when you mash up Free data with non-free services like google maps?