Talks/FLOSS Overview: Difference between revisions

From WikiDotMako
Line 21: Line 21:
* [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html GPL]
* [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html GPL]
* Strong orientation as social movement
* Strong orientation as social movement
** Software people are not always great at conveying this, but free
** Free software people are not always great at conveying this, but free software can be understand as a powerful call for user control over their own technology
software can be understand as a powerful call for user control over
their own technology
* [http://www.gnu.org GNU Project] and the creation of a replacement for UNIX
* [http://www.gnu.org GNU Project] and the creation of a replacement for UNIX



Revision as of 14:13, 17 June 2009

This talk tries to give a comprehensive overview of free and open source software. The talk is framed in terms of a historical narrative but the focus, in terms of content, tries to focus on the concepts, principles, projects, and people at the heart of free and open source software.

My background is in work on free software projects over 16 years(!) in a variety of projects:

Early History

Early Structure

Moving Beyond GNU

Open Source

  • Open Source is born of frustration with free software personality and its posture with business interests and the late 90s tech bubble and the DotCom boom
  • Open Source Initiative started by Eric Raymond (author of Cathedral and the Bazaar), Bruce Perens and others
  • Open Source Definition
  • Motivations emphasizing the pragmatic benefits of fee software
    • OS can be seen as a development methodology
    • "A inherently better way to produce better software"
  • "Opposite of a schism"

Going Mainstream (ups and downs)

  • Perhaps the major breakthrough was with Netscape releasing code to their browser in 1998
  • Many other companies ended up getting carried away in the boom (VA Linux (LNUX has single biggest IPO) (Krantz and Henry, 1999)
  • Dotcom Bust
  • Reemergence of people who care about liberty and freedom (or institutional independence and autonomy)
    • Social movements again
    • Governments in Europe/S. America/etc.

Adapting FOSS Principles

  • Many groups have been explicitly inspired and have created lots of other "open source blanks" (e.g., medicine, invention, literature, music, etc).
  • Most groups take inspiration from:
    • Massively parallel production
    • Large volunteer communities
    • High levels of "user innovation" and lead users
  • Most buildings on licenses (esp. copyleft) of FOSS but it's important to realize that these are instrumental in some cases, making mroe normatively sort of descriptions and calls for free things

New Challenges